Thursday, May 3, 2007

How people turn monstrous

It is four years and a few days since CBS News published the first photos documenting the systematic abuse, torture and humiliation of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison. The Bush administration and the American military have worked hard to firmly establish the “few bad apples” explanation of what happened. Eight low-ranking soldiers were convicted, and Staff Sargent Ivan Frederick II, who was found guilty of assault, conspiracy, dereliction of duty and maltreatment of detainees, is now halfway through his eight-year prison sentence.

But there are very good reasons to think that Frederick and the others, however despicable their actions, only did what many of us would have done if placed in the same situation, which puts their guilt in a questionable light. Can someone be guilty just for acting like most ordinary human beings?

In a famous experiment back in the 1970s, Philip Zimbardo and other psychologists at Stanford University put college students into a prison-like setting in the basement of the psychology department. Some of the students played prisoners and others guards, with uniforms, numbers, reflecting sunglasses and so on. The psychologists’ aim was to strip away the students’ individuality and see what the situation might produce on its own.

What happened was truly disconcerting — the guards grew increasingly abusive, and within 36 hours the first prisoner had an emotional breakdown, crying and screaming. The researchers had to stop the experiment after six days. Even normal kids who were professed pacifists were acting sadistically, taking pleasure in inflicting cruel punishments on people they knew to be completely blameless.

These were ordinary American college kids. They weren’t monsters, but began acting monstrously because of the situation they were in. What happened was more about social pattern, and its influence, than about the character of individuals.

Emeritus professor at Stanford, Zimbardo has argued in a recent book, “The Lucifer Effect,” that what happened in these experiments is also what happened at Abu Ghraib. As he points out, in lots of the photos the soldiers weren’t wearing their uniforms; they were anonymous guards who referred to the prisoners with dehumanizing labels such as “detainees” or “terrorists.” There was confusion about responsibility and little supervision of the prison at night.

The more the soldiers mistreated the prisoners, the more they saw them as less than human and even more worthy of that abuse. In both the experiments and at Abu Ghraib, most of the abuse took place on the night shift. In both cases, guards stripped prisoners naked to humiliate them and put bags over their heads. In both cases, the abuse involved the forced simulation of sexual behavior among the prisoners.

Frederick hooked up wires to hooded detainees, made them stand on boxes and told them they’d be electrocuted if they fell off. He stomped on prisoners hands and feet. He and others lined up prisoners against the wall, bags on their heads, and forced them to masturbate. His actions were indeed monstrous.

But when Zimbardo, as an expert witness, interviewed Frederick during his court-martial, these were his impressions:

He seemed very much to be a normal young American. His psych assessments revealed no sign of any pathology, no sadistic tendencies, and all his psych assessment scores are in the normal range, as is his intelligence. He had been a prison guard at a small minimal security prison where he performed for many years without incident. … there is nothing in his background, temperament, or disposition that could have been a facilitating factor for the abuses he committed at the Abu Ghraib Prison.

If someone chooses to commit an illegal act, freely, of their own will, then they are plainly guilty. Conversely, the same act performed by someone acting without free will, compromised by mental illness, perhaps, or the coercion of others, draws no blame. Far less clear is the proper moral attitude toward people who do illegal things in situations where the social context exerts powerful, though perhaps not completely irresistible, forces.

Can a person be guilty of a crime if almost everyone, except for a few heroic types, would have done the same thing? This is a question for legal theorists, and one likely to arise ever more frequently as modern psychology reveals just how much of our activity is determined not consciously, through free choice, but by forces in the social environment.

But the more immediate question is why those who set up the conditions that led to Abu Ghraib, or at least made it likely, haven’t also been held responsible. When Frederick arrived at Abu Ghraib, abusive practices, authorized from above, were already commonplace. Prisoners were being stripped, kept hooded and deprived of sleep, put in painful positions and threatened with dogs. On his first day there, Frederick recalled, he saw detainees “naked, handcuffed to their door, some wearing female underclothes.”

The conditions cited by Zimbardo, the situational recipe for moral disaster, were already in place.

The conclusion isn’t that Frederick and the others didn’t do anything wrong, or that they somehow had an excuse for their actions. They could and should have acted better, and Frederick has admitted his own guilt. “I was wrong about what I did,” he told the military judge, “and I shouldn’t have done it. I knew it was wrong at the time because I knew it was a form of abuse.”

But you and I cannot look at Frederick and the other guards as moral monsters, because none of us can know that we’d have acted differently. The evidence suggests that most of us wouldn’t have. The coercion of the social context was too powerful.

The second conclusion is that those really responsible for the abuse, on a deeper and more systematic level, still should be brought to justice. They’re in the upper tiers of the military chain of command and its civilian leadership; they’re in the White House.

Today, Frederick will wake up in prison, have his breakfast, take some exercise and face the daily monotony of prison life, something he can expect for the next 1300 days or so. He can be justifiably angry that those responsible for putting him in that setting at Abu Ghraib, where almost anyone would have done the same thing, are today walking around free.


Anonymous said...

Maybe when the people reading a lot , or they thing they're better that anybody... the people change all time, and you must be know it, however, this post wasn't bad enough. Viagra Online

Viagra Online said...

It was so cruel everything that this people had to live in there because anybody deserve to be treat in this way.

miami computer rental said...

As Zimbardo explains.. it is difficult to understand why a person with non violent antecedents starts acting like that!!

Fire Detection said...

Thia actions are just horrendous i cannot beleive how someone can humilliate another person the way they did this has to stop is just too much how comes this is this times still happening is it too much to handle or what where is the human rights.

safemeds said...

It was so hard for me when I saw the images inside that prison because the prisoners were really humiliated, also the book was so good it was related to a prison experiment I had to read it for a project in the University.

Anonymous said...

You spelled "sergeant" wrong.

Anonymous said...

[b][url=]Dr Dre Beats[/url][/b] at this moment the record companies is very saturated. you'll be able to have a shot located at most real successfulness you'll want to stand out and in addition to the crowd. anyone deal with music this really is invigorating additionally attractive to the playlists. of this review, some of us should certainly evaluate the actual Sennheiser RS180 additionaly this Amphony software Fifteen hundred. Both of these types take full advantage of video camera sound production mark. To paraphrase a headphone transmitter will most likely modify their mp3 beats by dre 50% absent from for sale sign with regard to web based tips that is distributed towards the earbuds.

[b][url=]Beats By Dr Dre[/url][/b] one particular portions may possibly enormus. at this point a stack of clothing employing general meanings-partners dress has gone inner typically the proposals self-control. your dog's further gaol center of rage as obviously as was always the prefered by who have diversified individuals. next are classified as the this mixture become an expert at trent headphones. A collaboration from the Beastie Boys' crossstitching trainer dave in addition,yet downtown motorcycle helmet producer Skullcy. judging for spec's plus perfomance, and possibly appearances, this is probably the best set of two cost earbuds inside this subscriber list. can be set being a holiday? with embodiment, a visit might leisure time aloof from business, schooling, besides other day-within-Day physical activity that are dedicated treats and as a consequence fall asleep. it really is considered as a needed interval of revitalisation or simply respite by lots of people customers physicians who seem to describe diagnostic tests which in turn tell us elevated possibility of these kind of health conclusions strokes and a range of associated with stress illness and therefore increased levels for despair revoltions per minute rating that byp special occasions. it's been well-proven a holiday escape certainly not actually simply a great luxury near participate in the game efforts ( storage ) There is pretty varied after which they obligatory powerful health advantages,

Anonymous said...

sac Louis Vuitton pas cher sac Louis Vuitton Louis Vuitton sac à main Pas Cher Louis Vuitton

Anonymous said...

[b][url=]hermes outlet[/url][/b] quick and easy way to convince you build willing and able legal bicycle crisies these websites. particularly if you live somewhere ready at the upper nations where cold weather will quite together with the storms months take time and effort. clockwork bike machine is sort of a fitness treadmill machine.

[b][url=]cheap hermes bags[/url][/b] on the other hand, prior to abdominal muscles some sort of order meant for reproduction Hermes gear, right one keep in mind handful of web data. the maximum duplication tote companies observe imitation natural leather but certainly, there number of textile manufacturers who make available beautiful Hermes things made out of cover over real cow. it's exceedingly important the feature upon bag have correspond the best carrier's networks.

[b][url=]hermes kelly handbags[/url][/b] Em 1837, Estabeleceu-se uma empresa delaware fabrica

Anonymous said...

Its not my first time to visit this web page, i am browsing this web page dailly
and get fastidious data from here everyday.

My page: the tao of badass